WHOLISTIC HEALTH JOURNAL
Editorial standards
Evidence comes first
Our editorial process separates established evidence, emerging research and practitioner claims. Source links let readers inspect the basis for a story. Interviews and quotations require an attributable record. Opinion is labeled.
Organizations and credentials
We do not fabricate organizations, credentials, reviews, availability or affiliations. Public directory records must identify a real operating organization and link to its official website and supporting sources. Directory inclusion does not establish treatment effectiveness.
Directory sources
The public directory contains researched clinics, health systems and wellness organizations verified through their official websites and recorded source evidence. NPI registry data is not treated as a business listing and is not published in the directory. Services, credentials and availability should still be confirmed directly with the organization and relevant licensing authority.
State selection criteria
A state feature considers publicly documented services, program scope, location, useful visitor information and relevance to whole-person health. The editorial team records sources and checks material facts before approval. These features are not scored national rankings. Comparative top-provider selections require a defined eligible group, credential checks, published evaluation criteria and documented review.
Selection and commercial independence
Featured selections require research and editorial approval. “Top” or “best” language requires documented methods. Advertising, sponsorship and paid placement must be distinguished from editorial work.
Corrections and publication
Send corrections through the contact form. Drafts remain private pending review. Publication dates require publisher approval. Authors and biographies are recorded before publication.